Islam, Ekskomunikasi, Dan Persoalan Penyesatan: Kajian Teo-Sosio-Analisis Atas Vonis Bid‘Ah, Riddah, Dan Kufr
Abstract
The Muslims’ responses toward and understanding about the texts of Qur’an and hadîts—usually named as living Qur’an/tafsîr and living hadîts/sunnah—are of the objects of Islamic studies. Such responses include the Muslims’ reception and their interpretations toward certain texts and exegete found in the Muslims’ daily life, such as traditionalizing of recitation of certain chapters and verses of Qur’an in some social religious ceremonies and celebration. The social reception of the interpretations take form of either small or large scale of institutionalization.
The Muslims’ responses toward and understanding about the texts of Qur’an and hadîts and their receptions do not cause any problems until the emergence of authorities in the Muslims’ communities that accuse them as heresy (bid‘ah), apostasy (riddah), and infidelity (kufr). This becomes the starting point of perverting and excommunication phenomena in Islam. This article is aimed at elaborating that problem and analyzing the phenomena through Theo-social-analysis.
References
Adian Husaini, Hegemoni Kristen-Barat dalam Studi Islam di Perguruan Tinggi (Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2006).
Ahmad bin Syuayb al-Nasâ’î, Sunan al-Nasâ’î, juz VI (Beirut: Dâr al-Ma’rifah, 1987).
Harifuddin Cawidu, Konsep Kufr dalam Al-Qur’an Al-Karim: Suatu Kajian Teologis dengan Pendekatan Tafsir Tematik (Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1991).
Hartono Ahmad Jaiz, “Aliran dan Paham Sesat di Indonesia”, http//www.geocities.com
Ian Saphiro, Language and Political Understanding (Michigan: UMI Out-Of-Print Books on Demand, 1981).
M. Mansyur, et. al., Metodologi Penelitian Living Qur’an dan Hadis, ed. Sahiron Syamsuddin (Yogyakarta: Penerbit Teras, 2007).
Masdar Hilmy, “Pluralisme Keberagamaan di Tengah Perebutan Kuasa: Mengarifi Kelianan dalam Agama-Agama melalui Netralitas Lembaga Keagamaan”, Makalah disampaikan di Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
Muhammad Abû Zahrah, Ushûl al-Fiqh (Kairo: Dâr al-Fikr al-‘Arabî, 1958).
Muhammad bin Ismâ’îl al-Bukhârî, Shahîh al-Bukhârî, juz IX (Beirut: Dâr al-Ma’rifah, 1987).
Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid, Imam Syafi’i: Moderatisme, Eklektisisme, Arabisme, ter. Khairon Nahdliyyin (Yogyakarta: LkiS, 1997).
Nina M. Armando (ed.), Ensiklopedi Islam (Jakarta: PT Ichtiar Baru van Hoeve, t.t.).
Ruzbihan Hamazani, “Islam, Ekskomunikasi, dan Masalah”, http://minhaj-al-aqilin.blogspot.com
Sayf al-Dîn Abû al-Hasan Al-‘Âmidî, Al-Ihkâm fî Ushûl al-Ahkâm ( Kairo: Mushthafâ al-Bâbi al-Halabî, t.t.).
Syihâb al-Dîn Abû Fadll Ibn Hajar Al-‘Asqalânî, Fath al-Bârî fi Syarh al-Bukhârî (Kairo: Mushthafâ al-Bâbî al-Halabî wa Awlâdih, 1951).
Al-Turmudzî, Sunan al-Turmudzî, jilid IX (t.t.p.: t.n.p., t.t.).
Umar A.M. Kasule, “Revolusi Ilmu Pengetahuan: Kenapa Terjadi di Eropa bukan di Dunia Muslim?”, Islamia, no. 3 (2004).
Yusuf Rahman, “Takfir dan Hak Berbeda Pendapat”, http://islamlib.com/id/
PDF downloaded: 182
