Criticism of Mustafa Azami's Critical Thoughts in Study of Hadith
Abstract
The existence and authenticity of hadith have become two of the most essential objects in the discourse of hadith among Muslims, especially after coming into contact with criticism from Orientalists. This article describes explicitly and criticizes Azami's hadith thought in the hadith debate among Orientalists. This research is an analytical descriptive research based on content analysis. The results reveal that Azami can position himself as a critic of the Western thesis by presenting historical data as a basis for his thoughts. The rhythm of the scientific debate modeled on by Western thinkers can be dived into and followed convincingly so that their responses and criticisms reach the Orientalists. Orientalists believe that Azami's criticism has not been able to divert the orientation of the general thesis that hadiths are not historically authentic. Azami's defense still needs convincing, and the arguments are still circular. This model of thinking has yet to satisfy the scientific desires of the Orientalists, so it has a small implications.
References
Al-Siba’i, Musthafa. Sunnah dan Peranannya dalam Penetapan Hukum Islam: Sebuah Pembelaan Kaum Sunni. Terj. Nurcholish Madjid. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 1991.
Amin, Kamaruddin. Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metode Kritik Hadis. Hikmah, 2009.
———. Rethingking: Hadith Critical Methods. Jakarta: Pustaka Mapan Jakarta, 2008.
Andi, Azhari, Luqman Hakim, and Mutawakkil Hibatullah. “Reinterpretasi Sunnah (Studi Pemikiran Muhammad Syahrur Terhadap Sunnah).” Jurnal Living Hadis 1, no. 1 (May 6, 2016): 79–100. https://doi.org/10.14421/livinghadis.2016.1069.
Anusantari, Inama. “Perspektif Orientalis Dalam Mengkaji Hadits Dan Bantahan Kaum Muslim: Perspektif Ignaz Goldziher, Joseph Franz Schacht Dan Mustafa Azami.” Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadits 6, no. 1 (2020): 103–24. https://doi.org/10.21043/riwayah.v6i1.6749.
Ardiansyah, Ardiansyah. “Konsep Sunnah dalam Perspektif Muhammad Syahrur Suatu Pembacaan Baru dalam Kritik Hadis.” Miqot 33, no. 1 (2009): 158225. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v33i1.160.
Arif, Syamsuddin. Orientalis & Diabolisme Pemikiran. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2008.
As-Siba’i, Mustafa. As-Sunnah Wa Makānatuhā Fῑ at-Tasyri’ al-Islāmi. Beirut: Al-Maktab al-Islami, 1998.
Aulassyahied, Qaem. “Studi Kritis Konsep Sunnah Muhammad Syahrur.” Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam 13, no. 1 (March 31, 2015): 125–56. https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v13i1.282.
Azami, M.M. Dirasat Fi Al-Ḥadiṡ an-Nabawi Wa Tarikh Tadwinih. Beirut: Al-Maktab al-Islami, 1985.
———. Kuttāb An-Nabī Saw. Ke-3. Beirut: Al-Maktab al-Islami, 1981.
———. Manhaj An-Naqd ‘Inda al-Muḥaddiṡῑn Nasy’Atuhu Wa Tārikhuhu. Ke-3. Riyad: Makhtabah al-Kautsar, 1990.
———. Studies In Early Hadith Literature With A Critical Edition of Some Early Tekts. Beirut: Lebanon: Al-Maktab al-Islami, 1968.
———. Studies in Hadith Methodology and Literature. Indianapolis: American Trust Publications, 1977.
Azami, Muhammad Mustafa. Studies in Hadith Methodology and Literature. Kuala Lumpur: The Other Press, 2002.
Berg, Herbert. The Development of Exegesis in Early Islam: The Authenticity of Muslim Literature from the Formative Period. Ke-1. Curzon: Curzon Press, 2000.
Brown, Daniel W. Rethinking Tradition in Modern Islamic Thought. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
———. “Western Hadith Studies.” In The Wiley Blackwell Concise Companion to the Hadith, 39–56. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118638477.ch2.
Calder, Norman. Studies in Early Muslim Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
Cook, Michael. Early Muslim Dogma: A Source-Critical Study. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
Erdil, Mustafa. On the Path of the Prophet: Fethullah Gulen’s Understanding of Sunnah. Clifton, New Jersey, USA: Tughra Books, 2023.
Fitria, Vita. “Komparasi Metodologis Konsep Sunnah Menurut Fazlur Rahman Dan Muhammad Syahrur (Perspektif Hukum Islam).” Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 45, no. 2 (July 1, 2011). https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v45i2.18.
Gazali, Muhammad al-. As-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah Baina Ahl al-Fiqh Wa Ahl al-Ḥadīṡ. Kairo: Dar al-Syuruq, 1996.
Hasan, Ahmed. The Early Development of Islamic Jurisprudence. Ke-1. India: Adam Publisher & Distributros, 1994.
Hoyland, Robert. “Writing the Biography of the Prophet Muhammad: Problems and Solutions.” History Compass 5, no. 2 (2007): 581–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-0542.2007.00395.x.
Huda, Nailil, and Ade Pahrudin. “Orientasi Kajian Hadis Kontemporer Indonesia (Studi Artikel E-Jurnal Dalam Portal Moraref 2015-2017).” Refleksi 17, no. 2 (December 27, 2018): 169–92. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v17i2.10204.
Idri. Hadis dan Orientalis: Perspektif Ulama Hadis dan Orientalis Tentang Hadis Nabi. Depok: Kencana, 2008.
Istianah, Istianah, and Sri Wahyuningsih. “The Hadith Digitization in Millennial Era: A Study at Center for Hadith Studies, Indonesia.” QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies) 7, no. 1 (June 3, 2019): 25–44. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v7i1.4900.
Juynboll, G.H.A. Kontroversi Hadis Di Mesir (1890-1960). Terj. Ilyas Hasan. Bandung: Mizan, 1999.
———. Muslim Tradition, Studies in Chronology, Provenance and Authorship of Early Hadith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Karim, Abdul. “Pemikiran Orientalis Terhadap kajian Tafsir Hadis.” ADDIN 7, no. 2 (2013): 307–34. https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v7i2.581.
Khon, Abdul Majid. Pemikiran Modern Dalam Sunah: Pendekatan Ilmu Hadis. Ke-1. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011.
Krippendorff, Klaus. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. London ; New York: Sage Publications Ltd, 2004.
Mahmudah, Nur. “Al-Quran sebagai Sumber Tafsir dalam Pemikiran Muhammad Shahrur.” Hermeneutik 8, no. 2 (2014).
Masrur, Ali. Teori Common Link G.H.A. Juynboll: Melacak Akar Kesejarahan Hadits Nabi. Yogyakarta: LKIS, 2007.
Minhaji, Akhmad, and Ali Masrur. Kontroversi Pembentukan Hukum Islam: Kontribusi Joseph Schacht. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2001.
Motzki, Harald. The Origins of Islamic Juresprudence. Meccan Fiqh Before the Classical Schools. Transliter: Marion H. Katz. Leiden: Brill, 2002.
Mu’ammar, M. Arfan, and Abdul Wahid Hasan. Studi Islam Kontemporer: Perspektif Insider/Outsider. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2017. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Studi_Islam_Kontemporer_Perspektif_Insid/Pc1MEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Studi+Islam+kontemporer:+perspektif+insider/outsider&printsec=frontcover.
Mubin, Muh Fatkul, Jannatul Husna, and Nurkholis Nurkholis. “Objektifitas Pemikiran Azami Tentang Sejarah Penulisan Hadis.” Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 21, no. 1 (June 30, 2021): 141–64. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v21i1.8152.
Najitama, Fikria. “Jilbab Dalam Konstruksi Pembacaan Kontemporer Muhammad Syahrûr.” Musãwa Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam 13, no. 1 (January 3, 2014): 9–18. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2014.131.9-18.
Nawas, Sitti Syakirah Abu. “‘Dirasat fi al-Hadits al-Nabawiy wa Tarikh Tadwinih’: Analisis Terhadap Pemikiran Hadis Muhammad Mushthafa al-Azamy.” Tahdis: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Hadis 8, no. 2 (2017): 223–39. https://doi.org/10.24252/tahdis.v8i2.7229.
Nugroho, Irzak Yuliardy. “Orientalisme Dan Hadits : Kritik Terhadap Sanad Menurut Pemikiran Joseph Schacht.” Asy-Syari’ah : Jurnal Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (July 3, 2020): 155–70. https://doi.org/10.55210/assyariah.v6i2.278.
Nurcholis, Moch. “Melihat Wajah Islam dari Orientalis: Telaah Nalar Orientalis tentang Hukum Islam.” Al-Majaalis : Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah 8, no. 2 (May 20, 2021): 412–24. https://doi.org/10.37397/almajaalis.v8i2.163.
Qaradawi, Yusuf al-. Kaifa Nata’amal Ma’as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyah. Kairo: Dar al-Syuruq, 2005.
Qāsimi, Muḥammad Jamāl ad-Dīn al-. Qawā‘id at-Tahdīṡ Min Funūn Muṣṭalah al-Hadīṡ. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, tt.
Saeed, Abdullah. The Qur’an: An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge, 2008.
Said, Edward W. Orientalism. Social Theory Re-Wired. New York: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357-43.
Saputra, Hasep. “Genealogi Perkembangan Studi Hadis dI Indonesia.” AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis 1, no. 1 (June 27, 2017): 41–66. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v1i1.164.
Schoeler, Gregor. The Oral and The Written in Early Islam. Terj. Uwe Vagelpohl. London and New York: Routledge, 2006.
Sholikhin, Muhammad. Hadis Asli Hadis Palsu: Studi Kasus Syekh MM Al-A’zami, PhD dalam Mengungkap Otentisitas Hadis. Yogyakarta: Garudhawaca, 2012.
Supian, Aan. “Studi Hadis Di Kalangan Orientalisme.” Nuansa : Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Kemasyarakatan 9, no. 1 (June 10, 2016): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.29300/nuansa.v9i1.370.
Suryadi, Suryadi. “Rekonstruksi Kritik Sanad Dan Matan Dalam Studi Hadis.” ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 16, no. 2 (October 1, 2015): 177–86. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v16i2.996.
Suryadilaga, Muhammad Alfatih. “Kajian Hadis Di Era Global.” ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 15, no. 2 (September 22, 2014): 199–212. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v15i2.773.
Syahrur, Muhammad. Al-Kitab Wa Qur’an: Qira’ah Mu’ashirah. Damaskus: Al-ahalli li al-Tiba’ah wa al- Nasyrwa al- Tauzi’, 1990.
———. Al-Kitab Wa al-Qur’an Qira’ah Mu’ashirah. Damaskus: al-Mathbuat, 2000.
———. Al-Sunnah al-Rasuliyyah Wa al-Sunnah al-Nabawwiyah Ru’yah Jadidah. Beirut: Dar as-Syaqi, 2012.
———. Dirasat Islamiyyah Mu’ashirah Nahw Ushul Jadidah Li al-Fiqh al-Islami. Terj. Sahiron Samsuddin, Dengan judul Metodologi Fiqh Islam Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: eLSAQ Press, 2008.
———. Nahwa Uṣūl Jadīdah Li Al-Fiqh al-Islāmy; Fiq al-Mar’ah al Washiyyah. n.d: al-Irs, al-Qawamah, at-Ta’addudiyah, al-Libas, 2000.
Syarifah, Umayyah. “Kontribusi Muhammad Musthafa Azami Dalam Pemikiran Hadis (Counter Atas Kritik Orentalis).” Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi Islam 15, no. 2 (2014): 222–41. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v15i2.2728.
Ulfiyati, Nur Shofa. “Pemikiran Muhammad Syahrur (Pembacaan Syahrur Terhadap Teks-Teks Keagamaan).” Et-Tijarie: Jurnal Hukum Dan Bisnis Syariah 5, no. 1 (December 4, 2018). https://doi.org/10.21107/ete.v5i1.4597.
Usman, Ermawati, Nurdin Nurdin, Ashir Ahmed, and Miftachul Huda. “A Netnography Analysis of Thematic Hadith Memes Distribution on Social Media.” Al-Albab 12, no. 2 (December 31, 2023): 171–88. https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v12i2.2778.
Wahid, Abdurrahman, ed. M.M. Azami, Pembela Eksistensi Hadis. Cet. 1. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2002.
Wathani, Syamsul. “Melawan Teori Otentisitas Hadits: (Counter Discourse Nabia Abbot Terhadap Teori Ignaz Goldziher).” Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Ilmu Studi Ushuluddin Dan Filsafat 15, no. 2 (2019): 245–67. https://doi.org/10.24239/rsy.v15i2.485.
Yakub, Ali Mustafa. Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Pustaka Hidayah, 2000.
Yusuf, Muhammad. “Bacaan Kontemporer : Hermeneutika Al-Qur’an Muhammad Syahrur.” Jurnal Diskursus Islam 2, no. 1 (April 22, 2014): 52–72. https://doi.org/10.24252/jdi.v2i1.6509.
Fulltext PDF downloaded: 160
Copyright (c) 2023 Ulumuna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
