Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Unregistered Polygamy Validation: Isbat Nikah, Polygamy Permit, and Due Process of Law in Indonesian Religious Courts

  • Alfitri Alfitri Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda
  • Rijal Imanullah Pengadilan Agama Tenggarong
  • Aulia Rahman Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda

Abstract

This article probes whether methods of validating unregistered polygamy in Indonesian Religious Courts have honored the due process of law. Judges have adopted two different methods in validating unregistered polygamy: first, by ordering concerned parties to apply for the issuance of a retroactive marriage certificate (isbat nikah), and second, by advising them to submit a polygamy permit application. Using the sociolegal approach in examining Ratio Legis and selected cases on unregistered polygamy validation across Indonesia, it finds that the existing methods have impacted protecting women’s and children’s rights and marriage law objectives. Opting for isbat nikah means perpetuating violations of the marriage law provisions and objectives, which restrict polygamy through court proceedings to be orderly administration and protect women’s and children’s rights. Meanwhile, requiring unregistered polygamists to remarry by applying for a polygamy permit could impact wives’ rights who are married without registration and their children’s. The 2018 Supreme Court’s Circular prohibiting the Religious Court from accepting applications for isbat nikah of unregistered polygamy shows its tendency to the formal application of the marriage law provisions. Even so, judges adopt the contentious isbat nikah to legalize unregistered polygamy, mainly when the parties involved accept their polygamy and live peacefully. This bottom-up approach arguably better meets the principles of fairness because all legal rights owed to concerned parties are respected.

Keywords: Islamic family law, unregistered polygamy, isbat nikah, polygamy permit

Author Biographies

Alfitri Alfitri, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda

Alfitri is an Associate Professor of Islamic Law at the Faculty of Sharia and Law, State Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN) Samarinda. He obtained his Ph. D. in Law, Societies, and Justice from the University of Washington, Seattle, the USA in 2015. His research interests include Islamic Law (theory and practice) and its intersection with Law and Society, and Law and Religion.

Rijal Imanullah, Pengadilan Agama Tenggarong

 

 

References

Alfitri. Islamic Law and Society in Indonesia: Corporate Zakat Norms and Practices in Islamic Banks. 1st ed. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2022.

Alfitri, Alfitri. “Legal Reform Project, Access to Justice and Gender Equity in Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 9, no. 2 (2012): 292–308.

———. “Pengesahan Poligami Siri di Indonesia: Tinjauan Hukum dan Masyarakat.” Laporan Penelitian. Samarinda: Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LPPM), UIN Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda, 2022.

———. “Protecting Women from Domestic Violence: Islam, Family Law, and the State in Indonesia.” Studia Islamika 27, no. 2 (August 3, 2020): 273–307. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v27i2.9408.

———. “Whose Authority? Contesting and Negotiating the Idea of a Legitimate Interpretation of Islamic Law in Indonesia.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 10, no. 2 (December 2015): 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2016.1.

Andaryuni, Lilik. “The Program of Circuit Isbat Nikah as the Embodiment of Access to Justice in Indonesia.” Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam 17, no. 1 (June 30, 2018). https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v17i1.1054.

Anshori, Abdul Ghofur. Hukum Perkawinan Islam: Perspektif Fikih dan Hukum Positif. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2011.

Asnawi, Natsir. Hukum Acara Perdata: Teori, Praktik, Dan Permasalahannya Di Peradilan Umum Dan Peradilan Agama. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2016.

Bedner, Adriaan, and Stijn van Huis. “Plurality of Marriage Law and Marriage Registration for Muslims in Indonesia: A Plea for Pragmatism.” Utrecht Law Review 6, no. 2 (June 4, 2010): 175–91. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.130.

Butt, Simon, and Nicholas Parsons. “Judicial Review and the Supreme Court in Indonesia: A New Space for Law?” Indonesia, no. 97 (2014): 55–85. https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.97.0055.

DiNata, Nia. Berbagi Suami: Fenomena Poligami di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2006.

Efendi, Jonaedi. Rekonstruksi Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2018.

Fajriyyah, Latifatul, and Alfitri Alfitri. “Hearsay Evidence Admissibility: Due Process and Evidentiary Rules in Muslim Marriage Legalization (Isbat Nikah).” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 16, no. 3 (October 4, 2022): 269–96. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2464.

Fauzan, M. Kaidah Penemuan Hukum Yurisprudensi Bidang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2014.

Groves, Harry. “Due Process of Law: A Comparative Study.” Marquette Law Review 45, no. 2 (January 1, 1961): 257–71.

Hamidin, Hamidin, and Alfitri Alfitri. “Safeguarding Women’s Constitutional Rights in the Judicial Reviews of Marriage Law on the Minimum Married Age Limit.” Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, July 12, 2021, 103–42. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v20i1.3307.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata: Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Hartanto, Dwiyana Achmad. “Local Wisdom Of Sedulur Sikep (Samin) Society’s Marriage In Kudus: Perspective Of Law Number 1 Year 1974 On Marriage.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 17, no. 2 (2017): 132–38. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.2.723.

Horii, Hoko, and Theresia Dyah Wirastri. “Living in a Legal Limbo: Mechanisms to ‘Fix’ The Legal and Social Positions of Unregistered Children in Indonesia.” The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies 2, no. 1 (September 7, 2022). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ijsls/vol2/iss1/1.

Hough, Charles M. “Due Process of Law: To-Day.” Harvard Law Review 32, no. 3 (1919): 218–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/1328129.

Irfan, M. Nurul. “Kriminalisasi Poligami dan Nikah Siri.” AL-’ADALAH 10, no. 2 (February 28, 2017): 121–40. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v10i2.248.

Kurnia, Lilawati and Nurbaity. “Online Halal Dating: AyoPoligami and the Contestations of Polygamy as the ‘New Normal’ in Indonesia.” In Gender, Islam and Sexuality in Contemporary Indonesia, edited by Monika Arnez and Melani Budianta, 105–21. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5659-3_6.

Latipulhayat, Atip. “Editorial: Due Process of Law.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 4, no. 2 (2017): i–iv.

Mahkamah Agung RI. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Dan Administrasi Peradilan Agama (BUKU II). Revisi 2014. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama, 2014. http://pta-palu.net/perpustakaan/index.php?p=show_detail&id=653.

Maliki, Muhammad Alwi Al, J. M. Muslimin, and Asmawi Asmawi. “Equality of Rights and Courts: Constitutional-Based Arguments on the Fixed-Standard of Minimum Age for Marriage in Lights of Maqāshid al-Syarīah.” Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam 20, no. 2 (2021): 285–320. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v20i2.3645.

Mustika, Dian, and Siti Marlina. “Integrated Marriage Itsbat: Analyzing The Polemics Behind Its Implementation.” Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam 18, no. 1 (July 2, 2019). https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v18i1.1344.

Nisa, Eva F. “The Bureaucratization of Muslim Marriage in Indonesia.” Journal of Law and Religion 33, no. 2 (August 2018): 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2018.28.

Nurlaelawati, Euis. “Pernikahan Tanpa Pencatatan: Isbat Nikah Sebuah Solusi?” Musawa Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam 12, no. 2 (July 1, 2013): 261–77. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2013.122.261-277.

Nurmila, Nina. “Polygamous Marriages in Indonesia and Their Impacts on Women’s Access to Income and Property.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 54, no. 2 (December 14, 2016): 427–46. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2016.542.427-446.

———. Women, Islam and Everyday Life: Renegotiating Polygamy in Indonesia. Routledge, 2009.

Nurmila, Nina, and Linda Rae Bennett. “The Sexual Politics of Polygamy in Indonesian Marriages.” In Sex and Sexualities in Contemporary Indonesia. Routledge, 2014.

Panggabean, H. P. Fungsi Mahkamah Agung dalam praktik sehari-hari: upaya penanggulangan tunggakan perkara dan pemberdayaan fungsi pengawasan MA. Cet. 1. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 2001.

Putra, Sri Gilang Muhammad Sultan Rahma, and Zulfia Hanum Alfi Syahr. Tingkat Kepatuhan dan Implementasi terhadap Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung oleh Hakim di Pengadilan. Cetakan ke-1. Rawamangun, Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.

Ridwan, H. R. Diskresi dan Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah. Cetakan Pertama. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2014.

———. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2006.

Saebani, Beni Ahmad. Perkawinan dalam Hukum Islam dan Undang-Undang: Perspektif Fiqh Munakahat dan UU No. 1/1974 tentang Poligami dan Problematikanya. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2008.

Shomad, Abd. Hukum Islam: Penormaan Prinsip Syariah dalam Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Sururie, Ramdani Wahyu. “Polemik Di Seputar Hukum Isbat Nikah Dalam Sistem Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 11, no. 2 (December 1, 2017): 233–46. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v11i2.1299.

Wirastri, Theresia Dyah, and Stijn Cornelis van Huis. “The Second Wife: Ambivalences towards State Regulation of Polygamy in Indonesia.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 53, no. 2 (May 4, 2021): 246–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2021.1912579.

Zainuddin, and Afwan Zainuddin. Kepastian Hukum Perkawinan Siri dan Permasalahannya Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2017.

Article Metrics
Abstract viewed: 278
Fulltext PDF downloaded: 74
Published
2024-09-11
How to Cite
Alfitri, A., Imanullah, R., & Rahman, A. (2024). Unregistered Polygamy Validation: Isbat Nikah, Polygamy Permit, and Due Process of Law in Indonesian Religious Courts. Ulumuna, 28(1), 313-344. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v28i1.639
Section
Articles