Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Asesmen Akhlak Mulia: Suatu Model Alternatif Penilaian Pembelajaran Agama

  • Siti Muri’ah Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri (STAIN) Samarinda Kaltim
Keywords: Pembelajaran, Asesmen, Akhlak, Model Evaluasi

Abstract

One weakness of akhlak teaching method applied in schools is its teacher centered assessment. Teachers feel as the most well-informed sources about students’ akhlak while teachers’ capability of knowing students’ akhlak comprehensively is limited. Teachers’ chance to meet face-to-face with students is only in the learning process so that teachers’ assessment can not show the real akhlak of their students. Teachers should involve other parties who often associate with students, especially their peers. In addition, assessment instrument used by the teachers should not be limited to examination only. Therefore, comprehensive akhlak assessment is needed.

In this writing, I describe alternative method to assess students’ akhlak. With this method, we can assess batiniyah dimensions including willingness, conscience, value and attitude and also lahiriyah dimensions manifested in behaviors. This method applies self and peer assessment by involving students in inter and intra relations. Assessment instruments could be questionnaires, observation and portfolios in likert scale, semantic differential and thurstone scale.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Bednar. & W. H. Levie, “Attitude Change Principles”, dalam Instructional Message Design: Principles from the Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, ed. M. Fleming & W. H. Levie (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications), 283-304.
A. F. Al-Ahwani, Al-Tarbiyyah fî al-Islâm (Kairo: Dâr Mâ’arif, t.t.).
A. Rudd & S. Stoll, “Measuring Student’s Character in Secondary Education: The Development of Principle Thinking Inventory”, dalam Journal of Research in Character Education, 2004, (2), 2, 156.
Aep Saefudin, “Akhlak dalam Perspektif Wacana Pemikir Muslim”, dalam Jurnal Ta’dib, (2), 1, 2002, 70.
Ahmad Amîn, Etika (Ilmu Akhlak) (Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1995).
___________, Kitâb al-Akhlâq (Kairo: Dâr al-Kutub al-Misriyyah, 1974).
Al-Ghazâlî, Al-Arbaîn fî Ushûl al-Dîn (Kairo: Maktabah al-Jindi, t.t.).
___________, Ihyâ’ ‘Ulûm al-Dîn, Jilid III (Kairo: al-Masyhad al-Husayn, t.t.).
Asmaran As, Pengantar Studi Akhlak (Jakarta: Rajawali, 2002).
B. F. Skinner, About Behaviorism (New York: Vintage Books, 1976).
B. Noonan & C. R. Duncan, “Peer and Self-Assessment in High Schools: Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation”, dalam A Peer-Reviewed Electronic Journal, (10), 17.
B. Umary, Materi akhlak (Solo: Ramadhani, 1993).
C. Bird, Social Psychology (New York: Appleton Century Co., 1967).
C. R. Kniker, You and Value Education (Ohio: Charless E. Mrrill Publishing Company, 1977).
D. Sluijsmans, F. Dochy & G. Moekerke, “Creating a Learning Environment by Using Self, Peer, and Co-Assessment”, 1998. http://extranet.ou.nl/inter-studie-alg-o31411/Symposium3 /materiaal/ bronnenmateriaal/ Sluijmansea.pdf.
D. W. Johnson & R. T. Johnson, Meaningful Assessment: A Manageble and Cooperative Process (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2002).
Djemari Mardapi, Pengembangan Instrument Penelitian Pendidikan (Yogyakarta: Pascasarjana UNY, 2005).
Gable R. K., Instrument Development in the Affective Domain (Boston: Kliwer Nijhoff Publishing, 1986).
Hendrix W. H. et.al., “Multimethod Approach for Measuring Change in Character”, dalam Journal of Research in Character Education, 2004, (2), 1, 60.
Ibrahîm Anîs, Al-Mu’jam al-Wasîth (Mesir: Dâr Mâ’arif, 1972).
J. S. Stark. & A. Thomas (eds.), Assessment and Program Evaluation (Colifornia: Simon & Schuter Custom Publishing, 1994).
J. W. Getzels, “The Problem of Interest: A Reconsideration”, Reading: Seventy-five Years of Progress. Supplementary Education Monographs, ed. H. A. Robinson (1966), 97-106.
Ji Peter et.al., “A Measurement Model of Student Character as Described by the Positive Action Program”, dalam Journal of Research in Character Education, 2004, (3), 2.
L. W. Anderson, Classroom Assessment: Enhanching the Quality of Teacher Decision Making (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher, 2003).
___________, Assessing Affective Characteristics in the Schools (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc. 1981).
M. J. al-Qâsimi, Mau’izah al- Mu’minîn, Jilid II (Kairo: Dâr al-‘Usûr li al-Tabha’ wa al-Nasyr, 1969).
M. Rokeach, The Nature of Human Values (New York: Free Press, 1973).
P. Black & D. William, “Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment”, dalam Phi Delta Kappa, 80 (2), 1998, 139-148.
P. Weeden, J. Winer & P. Broadfoot, Assessment: What’s in it for School? (New York: Routledge Falmer, 2002).
R. M. Gagne & J. B. Leslie Principles of Instructional Design (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc., 1974).
R. Mulyana, Mengartikulasikan Pendidikan Nilai (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2004).
S. Azwar, Sikap Manusia: Teori dan Pengukurannya (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005).
S. Hampshire, Freedom of Individual (New York: Harper, 1966), 16.
T. Lickona, Education for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility (New York: Bantam Books, 1991).
W. A. Gerungan, Psikologi Sosial (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2000).
W. P. Derriberry & S. J. Thomas, Moral Judgment, “Self Understanding and Moral Action: The Role of Multiple Construct”, dalam ProQuest Education Journal, 2005, (52). 1.
Zulkabir dkk., Islam Konseptual dan Kontekstual (Bandung: Itqan, 1993).
Published
2008-12-31
How to Cite
Muri’ah, S. (2008). Asesmen Akhlak Mulia: Suatu Model Alternatif Penilaian Pembelajaran Agama. Ulumuna, 12(2), 225-248. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v12i2.380
Section
Articles