Implementation of Progressive Law in Sharia Banking Dispute Settlement: Case Study of Religious Court Decisions in Indonesia
Abstract
This research aims to analyze the extent to which judges have applied progressive legal paradigm in deciding Sharia banking disputes and the extent to which the decisions have fulfilled the principles of legal certainty, justice, and value. This normative legal research uses statutory and case study approaches by analyzing Sharia banking dispute decisions obtained from the website of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. This research found that decisions based on textual legal interpretations tend to less implement progressive law, lacking of accommodating people's sense of justice as they put more emphasis on legal certainty. Meanwhile, decisions based on contextual legal interpretations tend to implement progressive law by prioritizing legal justice rather than legal certainty, more accommodating people’s sense of justice. Such different decisions are partly attributed to the different interpretations of judges due to different levels of competence and different understanding of Sharia among the judges. By participating in integrated and sustainable training, judges can improve their competence to deleiver justice for all concerned parties.
References
Abdurrachman, Hamidah, Achmad Irwan Hamzani, Fajar Ari Sudewo, Havis Aravik, and Nur Khasanah. “Application of Ultimum Remedium Principles in Progressive Law Perspective.” International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 10 (2021): 1012–22. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.119.
Akbar, Muhammad. “Hukum Progresif Sebagai Alternatif Hukum Yang Ideal.” Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum 15, no. 1 (2021): 125–37. https://doi.org/10.24239/blc.v15i1.702.
Ali, Mohammaed Imad, and Ikramur Rahman Falahi. Islamic Banking and Finance: Principles and Practices. Marifa Academy Private Limited, 2021.
Atikah, Ika. “Eksistensi Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (Khes) Sebagai Pedoman Hakim Dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama.” Muamalatuna, Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 9, no. 2 (2017): 143–62.
Dewan Syariah Nasional. Fatwa DSN No. 04/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 Tentang Murabahah (2000).
———. Fatwa DSN No. 111/DSN-MUI/IX/2017 Tentang Akad Jual Beli Murabahah (2017).
Fauzan. “Progressive Law Paradigm in Islamic Family Law Renewal in Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan 7, no. 2 (2020): 187–202. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v7i2.3617.
Fikriawan, Suad, Syamsul Anwar, and Misnen Ardiansyah. “The Paradigm of Progressive Judge’s Decision and Its Contribution to Islamic Legal Reform in Indonesia.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 15, no. 2 (2021): 249–62. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v15i2.4730.
Hariyanto, Erie. “The Settlement of Sharia Banking Dispute Based on Legal Culture as a Practice of Indonesian Islamic Moderation.” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial 14, no. 2 (2019): 301–16. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v14i2.1888.
Hariyanto, Erie, and Moh Hamzah. “Bibliometric Analysis of the Development of Islamic Economic Dispute Resolution Research in Indonesia.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 21, no. 2 (December 30, 2022): 221–33. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v21i2.6997.
Hasanah, Salasti Faridatun, A. Khumaidi Ja’far, and Muhammad Iqbal Fasa. “Konstruksi Hukum Progresif: Urgensinya Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah.” Jurnal Program Studi Ekonomi Syariah STAIN Madina 2, no. 2 (2021): 100–119.
Ilyas, Amir. Kumpulan Asas-Asas Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali, 2016.
Indonesia. Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR) (1941).
———. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata) (1847).
———. Undang-Undang No. 7 tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan (1992).
———. Undang-Undang No. 10 tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 7 tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan (1998).
———. Undang-Undang No. 21 tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah (2008).
———. Undang-Undang Peradilan Agama, UU No.50 Tahun 2009 Jo. UU No.3 Tahun 2006 Jo. UU No.7 tahun 1989, LN No.159 tahun 2009 TLN NO. 5078 Jo. LN No.22 Tahun 2006 TLN No.4611 Jo. LN No.49 Tahun 1989 TLN No.3400 (2006).
Iqbal, Munawar, and David T. Llewellyn. Islamic Banking and Finance: New Perspectives on Profit Sharing and Risk. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2002.
Kesek, Sastiono. “Prinsip Hukum Progresif Sebagai Paradigma Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah 14, no. 3 (2014): 131.
Maggalatung, A Salman. “Hubungan Antara Fakta Norma, Moral, Dan Doktrin Hukum Dalam Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim.” Jurnal Cita Hukum 2, no. 2 (2014): 185–92. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i2.1462.
Mahkamah Agung. Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 93/PUU-X/2012 tentang Penjelasan Pasal 52 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang No. 21 Tahun 2008 (2012).
Mahkamah Agung RI. “Membedah Perma Tata Cara Penyelesaian Perkara Ekonomi Syariah.” https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/seputar-ditjen-badilag/seputar-ditjen-badilag/membedah-perma-tata-cara-penyelesaian-perkara-ekonomi-syariah, 2016.
———. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 14 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Perkara Ekonomi Syariah (2016).
———. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia No. 02 Tahun 2008 Tentang Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (2008).
———. Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Pusat No. 670/Pdt.G/2021/PA.JP (2021).
———. SK KMA No. 142/KMA/SK/IX/2011 Tentang Sistem Kamar (2011).
———. SK KMA No. 143/KMA/IX/ 2011 Tentang Penunjukan Ketua Kamar dalam Sistem Kamar pada MA (2011).
———. SK KMA No. 144/KMA/SK/IX/2011 Tentang Hakim Agung (2011).
———. Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung No. 233/K/Pdt/2008 (2008).
———. Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung No. 791K/SIP/1972 (1972).
Masud, Muhammad Khalid, Brinkley Messick, and David S. Powers. Islamic Legal Interpretation Muftis and Their Fatwas. London: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Mukhidin. “Hukum Progresif Sebagai Solusi Hukum Yang Mensejahterahkan Rakyat.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 1, no. 3 (2014): 267–86.
Musjtari, Dewi Nurul. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Media Hukum 20, no. 2 (2013): 301–16.
Mustansyir, Rizal. “Landasan Filosofis Mazhab Hukum Progresif Tinjauan Filsafat Ilmu.” Jurnal Filsafat 18, no. 1 (2008): 20–23.
Oseni, Umar A., and Abu Umar Faruq Ahmad. “Dispute Resolution in Islamic Finance: A Case Analysis of Malaysia.” In Ethics, Governance and Regulation in Islamic Finance, 127. Doha, Qatar: Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation, 2015.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. “Statistik Perbankan Syariah Juli 2022.” Jakarta, 2022.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Progresif Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009.
Ramadhan, Suci, and Jm. Muslimin. “Indonesian Religious Court Decisions on Child Custody Cases: Between Positivism and Progressive Legal Thought.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 21, no. 1 (June 10, 2022): 89. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v21i1.5723.
Rifai, Ahmad. Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Persfektif Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.
Salman, H. R. Otji. Filsafat Hukum: Perkembangan & Dinamika Masalah. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2010.
Suadi, Amran. Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah : Teori Dan Praktek. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Wade, Ibrahim. Islamic Finance in the Global Economy. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press, 2000.
Weruin, Urbanus Ura. “Logika, Penalaran, Dan Argumentasi Hukum.” Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 2 (2017): 374. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1427.
Yuspin, Wardah, and Yurisvia Previlega Hatinuraya. “Tinjauan Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Perekonomian Syariah Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006.” Jurnal Jurisprudence 6, no. 1 (2015): 69. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v6i1.3000.
Zulkifli, Hasan, and Mehmet Asutay. “An Analysis of the Courts’ Decisions on Islamic Finance Disputes.” ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance 3, no. 2 (2011): 41–71.
Fulltext PDF downloaded: 296
Copyright (c) 2023 Ulumuna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
